Neither the completion of an intake nor the submission of any other information to this law firm constitutes the establishment of an attorney client relationship. No attorney client relationship will exist between you and Nadrich and Cohen, LLC without a specific written retainer agreement between you and this firm.


Jeffrey Nadrich on Google+

Nationwide Representation
Product Liability Lawyer

Victories and Settlements

We are proud of the victories and settlements we have obtained as well as the settlements our legal teams and co-counsel partners have obtained.

I am glad they were there to help me!
I was very happy with how little Nadrich & Cohen took out of my settlement as payment for the representation. I believe I would have been willing to pay more if they had asked for it. I am glad they were there to help me, and that they are so reasonable with their charges.
Written by: Peter W
5 / 5 stars

$4,500,000 Settlement Stevens Johnson Syndrome Dilantin
$4,000,000
Settlement Stevens Johnson Syndrome Dilantin
$3,500,000
Settlement  Fen Phen PPH victim
$3,000,000
Settlement Fen Phen PPH victim
$5,000,000.00
Fen Phen PPH victim
$5,000,000.00 Fen Phen PPH victim
$5,000,000.00 Fen Phen PPH victim
$8,000,000.00 settlements for Bausch & Lomb Contact lens cleaning solution victims.


Additional Settlements or Verdicts of $1 Million Dollars or More

$141.1 Million 1997-2000 Defective Products
$112 Million 2006 Defective Products
$54 Million 2003-2004 Defective Products
$18 Million 2009 Defective Products
$18 Million 2008 Defective Products
$11 Million 2001-2003 Defective Products
$7 Million 2007 Defective Products
$5 Million 2003 Defective Product
$4 Million 2004 Defective Product
$4 Million 2000 Defective Product
$3.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$3.5 Million 2003 Defective Product
$3.2 Million 2001 Defective Product
$3 Million 2004 Defective Product
$3 Million 2001 Defective Product
$3 Million 2000 Defective Product
$2.8 Million 2001 Defective Product
$2.6 Million 2001 Defective Product
$2.6 Million 2001 Defective Product
$2.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$2.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$2.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$2.5 Million 2001 Defective Product
$2.5 Million 2001 Defective Product
$2.4 Million 1997 Defective Product
$2.2 Million 2000 Defective Product
$2 Million 2004 Defective Product
$2 Million 2000 Defective Product
$1.85 Million 1994 Defective Product
$1.75 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1.75 Million 2000 Defective Product
$1.725 Million 2003 Defective Product
$1.725 Million 2003 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2003 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2000 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2000 Defective Product
$1.5 Million 2000 Defective Product
$1.4 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1.25 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1.25 Million 2003 Defective Product
$1.25 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1.25 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1.15 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1.15 Million 2003 Defective Product
$1.15 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2004 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product
$1 Million 2001 Defective Product

The above represents victories and settlements that have been obtained. The above is meant to be illustrative only of settlements and victories we and our partners have obtained in dangerous drug recalls and medical device cases. They are not to be meant as a guarantee or a likelihood that we will obtain these or similar amounts for your case.


DISCLAIMER: Any mention of past results are specific to the facts and legal circumstances of each of the client’s cases and should not be used to form an expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each client’s case. Nadrich and Cohen, LLP is proud of its past achievements, but its prior success does not and cannot guarantee a similar outcome in the future.

Free Case Review click to get your free evaluation